There are No Tits in Jane Austen

I like to think that I have wide-ranging, eclectic tastes — computer gaming, knitting, an appreciation of Twinkies and aerosol cheese (not concomitantly), and least not of all, good books. Yet, I find it disconcerting when I go to a gaming blog to find an article about the works of Jane Austen.

The original article appears here and the gist of it is that a writer in England took some chapters from a few of Austen’s books, changed the names, and submitted them to 18 different literary agents and publishing houses. Not only were the chapters rejected – if he got a response at all – only one of the responders was able to identify the work as Austen’s.

Now, I realize that not everyone has read Pride and Prejudice, but we’re talking about BOOK PEOPLE in ENGLAND for God’s sake, not stereotypical male gamers who are quick to label any book and/or movie1 as “boring” if it doesn’t contain car chases, tits, explosions, lasers, computer-generated special effects, tits, aliens, mutant vampires, tits, Klingons, psychotic Vietnam vets toting flamethrowers, tits, or Jean-Claude Van Damme.2 The director who makes a movie with mutant Klingon vampires carrying flamethrowers who may or may not be the PTSD-induced hallucinations of Jean-Claude Van Damme3 can nail this demographic and laugh his or her butt off all the way to the bank, but only if there are plenty of boudacious ta-tas involved.

female-klingon.jpg

But I digress.

This isn’t the first time I’ve had my old fart response of “What is the world coming to?” Far from it. But how often does one have the opportunity to mention Jane Austen, tits, and Klingons together in the same blog post?

 

* * * * *
  1. Well, movies really since these people aren’t Readers. I’m certain they’re capable of reading, and have basic literacy skills, but anyone who comments that “Terry Prachett’s Discworld books will be read centuries from now” lacks depth as a literary critic. []
  2. Or Bruce Willis, or whoever is the current action-movie leading man – I certainly don’t know – who runs the gamut of emotions from A to B (with a nod to Dorothy Parker). []
  3. Or Bruce Willis. []

2 Responses to “There are No Tits in Jane Austen”

  1. He-who-buys-booze-from-saurians Says:

    This would have never happened in Gene Roddenberry’s lifetime. Damn ‘forever’ clause contracts should have been written… anything with ‘STAR TREK’ logo on it includes the inherent premise that REPTILES don’t have TITS.

  2. Spike Says:

    Ha.

    Great illustrative example of appealing to sexually repressed nerds: a Klingon with “tips”.

    You’ve got a sharp wit.

Leave a Reply